This file as pdf
here

 

 

 


Strength - Weakness of Forces


"Strength" and "Weakness" as complementary properties

- only some general aspects:

We can presume that strength and weakness are complementary properties as dimension degree poles, not only a question about quantitative differences.
   If a force is weak in one point of measurement, this doesn´t necessarily mean that the force in that point is indifferent in the context. The measurement perhaps takes place in an origin of coordinates where the force is counterbalanced by its counterforce.
   Alternatively it could mean that the measurement takes place at "the terminal point" of the force, where the force shows up in its complementary form, perhaps under another name. Its "weakness" is then in that point a complementary strength.

- Photons with weak energy have longer effect with respect to time.
- Gravitation, which is said to be negligible in the atom, could be found as a factor in the strong force, perhaps in some complementary form.

Strength of forces should be related to different energy forms (complexly composed of (+/-)-energies in different steps). A comparison made from one energy form alone should in that case be misleading?

A continuous scale from strength to weakness can also be seen as analogous to a "density gradient": from that point of view represent a scale for distance to a center, a 0-pole. Strength and weakness will then depend on which center the measurement is related to.
   When the forces also are related to different physical quantities (as mass, charge etc.), one can wonder if it really is possible to quantitatively compare their strengths? In which quantity shall the strength be measured? In time, in effect at a distance, in reach, in angle degrees or…?

Relative strength according to the sources (1973)
FG 10-41…10-37 (figures vary)
FEM ~ 10-2
Fst 100
Fw ~10-14 (1973) New information says 10-5 ?

According to Gamow the quotient between strengths of Fst and FEM is ca. 137.
    There is a coupling too between the numbers 41 (a 10-power) and 137, pole-exchanging the log-base. According to a hypothesis we could in some contexts have the sum of poles in d-degree 4, 10 "E", as log-base in outward direction in a dimension chain, and have 2 "E", the sum of poles in d-degree 0/00, as the log-base in inward direction.

4 ---- 3 ---- 2 ---- 1 ---- 0/00 (~5´) - - -> 4
|cccccccccccccccccccccc|ccccccccccccc |
1041 ------ ~ ------------- 2137 - - - - -> 10lg137

(1041 = 2136,2, 1041,24 = 2137)

 

 

 


Menu Bar:

If layers on menu bar don't function on your computer,
click here for the selected links!

To the background model

= HOME

Files in Physics:

Added notes 2014:

x1. Macrocosm:
Gravity waves, Dark matter etc.

x2. Quantum Mechanics:
Entanglement, Probabilities etc.

x3. Englert's - Higg's theory, Higgs boson and
a view on the Standard Model

Files Index to Temperature
in one documen, pdf, 128 pages

Files Quantum Physics to the end
in one document, pdf, 106 pages

 

To Survey:
Web site content,
more in detail here

Latest updated
2017-01-09


Contact:
u5d

© Åsa Wohlin:
Universe in 5 dimensions - as a model of Zero.
A conceptual structure suggested for interpretations in different sciences.
Free to distribute if the source is mentioned.
Texts are mostly extractions from a booklet series, made publicly available in year 2000.