The Solar System: Data from two different sources, in Earth units:
Planet |
Distance, AE |
Masses/earth |
Abbreviations |
Mercury |
0,387 |
0,054 |
Merc |
Venus |
0,723 |
0,815 |
Ven |
Earth |
1,000 |
1 |
Ea(rth) |
Mars |
1,524 |
0,108 |
Mars |
Asteroid belt, ca. |
2,8... |
~ ? ~ 0 |
Ast. (ast) |
Jupiter |
5,203 |
318 - 317,89 |
Jup |
Saturn |
9,54 |
95 - 95,147 |
Sat |
Uranus |
19,2 |
14,5 - 14,54 |
Ur |
Neptune |
30,1 |
17,2 - 17,23 |
Nept |
Pluto |
39,4 |
0,18 |
Pl |
Sum: |
109,877 |
446,857 - 446,964 |
|
A short introduction
The hunting for more of a given order in our planet system may seem rather
crazy in the views of modern astronomers. It is presumably contrary
to modern opinions about the birth of the solar system out of
masses of dust through rotating magnetic fields and other dynamic
processes and "random" collisions and, above all, variability
over time.
The research not only becomes curiously Earth-Sun-centered
but also Now-centered.
(And there is not much knowledge yet of other
planet systems to compare with.)
That there is some order at least is evident from Kepler's laws
for the relation between orbital time of the planets and the orbital
radii:
A3/T2 = c x (Msun + Mplanet) A
= distance to the sun
..................................................T
= orbital time
..................................................c
= a constant
..................................................M
= mass
And then we have the suggested formula of Bode for the distances
of planets from the sun (in Earth units = AE): 0, 4 + 0, 3 x 2x
(x = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6, 7)
0,4 = ca. distance for Mercury (0,387).
x = 0 gives 0,7 = ca. distance for Venus etc.
The formula agrees rather well for all planets but
Neptune. Since this planet was found, the astronomers have thought
that the formula perhaps was a chance.
To Planet system in AE - Expondnt 3/2
|